Juno Mission

JunoCam PDS4 Peer Review

 

Contents:

 

 


Overview

The Planetary Data System requires a proposed archive to pass a peer review before it can be archived. The purpose of the review is to ensure that the data set is scientifically useful, well documented, and accessible to scientists. PDS is conducting this review of the JunoCam PDS4 Data Archive according to the customary procedure for mission-generated collections that are delivered over time. Before data acquisition begins, the design of the data products is reviewed as demonstrated in a Software Interface Specification (SIS) document and a simulated sample product. Then, when actual data are delivered, they are checked to ensure that they comply with the design specified in the SIS.

Below is a list of suggested review criteria. Feel free to comment on any aspect of the archive, tools, and documentation. If a criterion is not your area of expertise, you do not have to comment on it.

NOTE: Please read through the Liens list prior to beginning your review. These are a set of items in development with an accompanying rationale.

See the Help section below for more additional information on the peer review process, PDS4, and other FAQs.

Please email your comments to Cristina De Cesare by Tuesday, December 11, 2018. Be as specific as you can in order to help the data providers improve the data set. Thank you for participating in the JunoCam PDS4 Peer Review.

 


Materials

back to top

 


Help

Here are some resources with additional information about the peer review process, please follow the following links for additional information:

back to top

 


Schedule

Date Event
Tuesday, November 27, 2018 Review begins; Sample PDS4 bundle is made available to reviewers. Reviewers have four weeks to examine the bundle and send written comments to Cristina De Cesare.
Friday, December 14, 2018 All reviewers' comments are due.
Thursday, December 20, 2018 Reviewers' comments and liens summary, in the form of a table, is distributed to all reviewers and the JunoCam team.
Wednesday, January 9, 2019 The PDS IMG Node responds to comments and liens by indicating, in the table, any action to be taken or not. Updated table will be redistributed.
Friday, January 11, 2019 If necessary, all reviewers and data providers participate in a teleconference to resolve any outstanding issues.
Friday, January 11, 2019 JunoCam Peer Review officially closes.

back to top

 


Liens & Errata

This section will briefly describe some of the known issues and/or items still to be determined regarding the JunoCam archive and the PDS4 Information Model. If any of these are a concern, please raise them in your peer review comments.

back to top

 


Reviewers and Other Personnel

Review Coordinator

Name Affiliation Email Phone
Cristina De Cesare PDS Imaging Node, JPL Cristina.M.DeCesare@jpl.nasa.gov 818-354-5642

Reviewers

Name Affiliation Email Phone Comments Received
Richard Chen PDS Engineering Node, JPL Richard.L.Chen@jpl.nasa.gov 818-354-1259 12/12/18
Glen Cushing USGS gcushing@usgs.gov 12/11/18
Trent Hare PDS Geosciences Node - USGS thare@usgs.gov 12/11/18
Lyle Huber PDS Atmospheres Node, NMSU lhuber@nmsu.edu 575-646-1862 12/4/18
Jordan Padams PDS Engineering Node, JPL Jordan.H.Padams@jpl.nasa.gov 818-354-3130
Paul Ramirez PDS Imaging Node, JPL Paul.M.Ramirez@jpl.nasa.gov 818-354-1015
Anna Waldron PDS Imaging Node, JPL anna.waldron@jpl.nasa.gov 818-393-5727 12/11/18

back to top

 

 


Last updated Tuesday July 3, 2018 12:35 PM